Vials subjected to a variety of independent microscopic and spectroscopic observations and analyses have shown little nucleic acid material and lots of graphene oxide.
There's really no objective evidence that it's graphene either.
La quinta columna had an interesting paper but even that had huge holes that they admitted.
Why didn't they run spectrum analysis? Because pictures prove it? Isn't that the nonsense pseudoscience that virology uses to prove viruses? Haha
I've read everything claiming to show graphene, and the only really objective one is that some batches have contamination of metals from the process, not just graphene. Mind you, they use graphene as a lubricant for the seals of syringes and other devices as it supposedly can lubricate well even at very cold temperatures....
Let's get to the elephant in the room:
there is clear proof that the lipids get stuck in the spleen and other key organs, causing damage.
Moderna even had issues with multiple doses when they were developing it as a gene therapy.
But hey, let's forget that and choose a red herring whether it be spike protein, mRNA, graphene, "viruses" etc
So? You allowed politicians to inject untested products into your children not because of what they did or didn't contain, but because you are all joyous to have the opportunity to show Daddy-Government that you would gladly sacrifice your own children before Questioning Him. Why else do you have thousands of websites begging Daddy to please abuse you less, none acting to take legal action even though 1) politicians are exempt from the law in no Western nations, 2) mandating, coercing &/or forcing anyone to take a product IS illegal thus 3) you all could legally band together & end the mandates?
Because none of you WANTS to view Daddy as a mere mortal, but wants to continue worshipping (insert politician;'s name here)'s wrinkly old arse**** & be glad for the chance to breathe in their Holy Atmosphere. I can't even PAY any of you to even DISCUSS taking the legal, non-violent route to saving children's lives.
What are children's lives compared to the chance to do THAT?
There's really no objective evidence that it's graphene either.
La quinta columna had an interesting paper but even that had huge holes that they admitted.
Why didn't they run spectrum analysis? Because pictures prove it? Isn't that the nonsense pseudoscience that virology uses to prove viruses? Haha
I've read everything claiming to show graphene, and the only really objective one is that some batches have contamination of metals from the process, not just graphene. Mind you, they use graphene as a lubricant for the seals of syringes and other devices as it supposedly can lubricate well even at very cold temperatures....
Let's get to the elephant in the room:
there is clear proof that the lipids get stuck in the spleen and other key organs, causing damage.
Moderna even had issues with multiple doses when they were developing it as a gene therapy.
But hey, let's forget that and choose a red herring whether it be spike protein, mRNA, graphene, "viruses" etc
So? You allowed politicians to inject untested products into your children not because of what they did or didn't contain, but because you are all joyous to have the opportunity to show Daddy-Government that you would gladly sacrifice your own children before Questioning Him. Why else do you have thousands of websites begging Daddy to please abuse you less, none acting to take legal action even though 1) politicians are exempt from the law in no Western nations, 2) mandating, coercing &/or forcing anyone to take a product IS illegal thus 3) you all could legally band together & end the mandates?
Because none of you WANTS to view Daddy as a mere mortal, but wants to continue worshipping (insert politician;'s name here)'s wrinkly old arse**** & be glad for the chance to breathe in their Holy Atmosphere. I can't even PAY any of you to even DISCUSS taking the legal, non-violent route to saving children's lives.
What are children's lives compared to the chance to do THAT?